Advancing open source analysis and development
|
FOSSology Advancing open source analysis and development |
This shows you the differences between the selected revision and the current version of the page.
| nfs_performance_investigation 2010/07/29 05:44 | nfs_performance_investigation 2010/08/12 20:17 current | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| * In my base test sytem: default is 8 | * In my base test sytem: default is 8 | ||
| * Change to small and to large (4, 16, 32, 128), DD test no more changes | * Change to small and to large (4, 16, 32, 128), DD test no more changes | ||
| + | ==== Third phase NFS performance investigation ==== | ||
| + | === Test Environment === | ||
| + | Hardware: | ||
| + | *bl480c-1.test (CPU: 2xQuad-Core Intel Xeon, 3.00GHz MEM: 12x2GB) web/db/scheduler | ||
| + | *bl460c-9.test (CPU: 2xMulti-Core Intel Xeon, 2.33GHZ MEM: 4x1GB) agent | ||
| + | *bl460c-13.test (CPU: 1xMulti-Core Intel Xeon, 3.00GHZ MEM: 4x1GB) agent | ||
| + | *bl460c-15.test (CPU: 1xMulti-Core Intel Xeon, 3.00GHZ MEM: 4x1GB) agent | ||
| + | *bl460c-10.test (CPU: 2xMulti-Core Intel Xeon, 2.33GHZ MEM: 4x1GB) nfs server | ||
| + | Test Data: | ||
| + | *SLES-11-SP1-DVD-x86_64-GMC3-DVD1.iso 2.9G | ||
| + | *SLES-11-SP1-DVD-x86_64-GMC3-DVD2.iso 4.3G | ||
| + | *SLES-11-SP1-DVD-x86_64-GMC3-DVD3.iso 2.7G | ||
| + | Test Case: | ||
| + | - Current corss mount system: Using UI upload 3 isos as close as together, only queue nomos job. | ||
| + | - 1 dedicated NFS server use single nfs mount: Using UI upload 3 isos as close as together, only queue nomos job. | ||
| + | - 1 dedicated NFS server use single nfs mount, increase nfs server memory from 4G to 8G: Using UI upload 3 isos as close as together, didn't finished all nomos job. | ||
| + | === Test Results === | ||
| + | {{:nfs_result.jpg|}} | ||
| ===== NFS configuration Recommendations ===== | ===== NFS configuration Recommendations ===== | ||
| So based on above investigation and testing, i have follow recommendations for multiple FOSSology setup: | So based on above investigation and testing, i have follow recommendations for multiple FOSSology setup: | ||
| - | - Use single NFS server to instead of cross mount NFS, also suggest the NFS server don't run other things db/web/scheduler/agent | + | - If you have a amazing server with large memory, i recommend use single NFS server with large memory to instead of cross mount NFS, also suggest the NFS server don't run other things db/web/scheduler/agent. |
| + | Otherwise cross mount configuration NFS will be our prefer. | ||
| - About NFS client mount options | - About NFS client mount options | ||
| * Modern Linux clients mostly have good defaults, most mount options you specify will make things worse | * Modern Linux clients mostly have good defaults, most mount options you specify will make things worse | ||
