Bug #2313
missing and incorrect licenses
| Status: | New | Start date: | 06/14/2012 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | Normal | Due date: | ||
| Assignee: | % Done: | 0% |
||
| Category: | Nomos | |||
| Target version: | - | |||
| Rank: | 99 | Tester: |
Description
Hi,
I've created an archive with the texts of SPDX' licences and scanned them with Fossology : the archive and the results are on the wiki page:
http://www.fossology.org/projects/fossology/wiki/MatchSPDXLicenceIDs
A quick and may be naive analyse of the results:
- Nomos seems to give the "Public-domain" tag a little bit too liberally. For instance GFDL-1.1 and GFDL-1.2 are identified respectively as "GFDL_v1.1 ,Public-domain" and "GFDL_v1.2 ,Public-domain".
- The Creative Commons licences are not accurately identified (for instance CC-BY-2.0, CC-BY-NC-2.0 and CC-BY-NC-ND-2.0 are all identified as CCPL_v2.0.
- Some licences are just missing and recognised as such: YPL-1.0, YPL-1.1 ("UnclassifiedLicense"), Multics ("No_license_found")
- Some licenses are not precisely identified but related to a family OLDAP-2.8 BSD-style
These points might need some fixing, but I think it's rather independent from the IDs harmonization.
Camille
History
Updated by Mary Laser 9 months ago
- Target version deleted (
2.0.1)
Updated by Bob Gobeille 8 months ago
- Rank set to 99
Change unranked issues to rank 99 so they show up in a ranking report at the bottom. Otherwise, they show up on top.